لاجڪ گيٽ

هڪ لاجڪ گيٽ (Logic Gate) هڪ اھڙو ڊوائيس (عام طور تي مختلف قسمن جي ٽرانزسٽرن جو مجموعو) آهي جيڪو هڪ بولين فنڪشن، هڪ يا وڌيڪ بائنري ان پٽ تي ڪيل هڪ منطقي آپريشن، جيڪو هڪ واحد بائنري آئوٽ پُٽ پيدا ڪري ٿو، انجام ڏئي ٿو. تناظر تي منحصر ڪري ٿي، ته اصطلاح هڪ مثالي لاجڪ گيٽ جو حوالو ڏئي سگهي ٿي، هڪ جن ۾، مثال طور، صفر اڀرڻ جو وقت ۽ لامحدود فين آئوٽ يا اها هڪ غير مثالي جسماني ڊوائيس جو حوالو ڏئي سگهي ٿي.[1]
لاجڪ گيٽس ٺاهڻ جو بنيادي طريقو ڊائيوڊ ٽيوب يا ٽرانزسٽر استعمال ڪندي آهي جيڪا اليڪٽرانڪ سوئچ طور ڪم ڪندا آهن. اڄڪلهه، گھڻا لاجڪ گيٽس "ميٽل-آڪسائيڊ-سيمي ڪنڊڪٽر فيلڊ-اثر ٽرانزسٽر" (MOSFETs) مان ٺهيل آهن.[2] انهن کي ويڪيوم ٽيوب، ريلي لاجڪ سان برقي مقناطيسي ريلي، فلوئڊ لاجڪ، نيوميٽڪ لاجڪ، آپٽڪس، صوتيات[3] يا اڃا به ميڪاني يا ٿرمل طريقن سان پڻ ٺاهي سگهجي ٿو. [4]
لاجڪ گيٽ کي ساڳئي طريقي سان ڪاسڪيڊ ڪري سگهجي ٿو،جيئن بولين فنڪشن ٺاهي سگهجن ٿا، سڀني بولين لاجڪ جي طبعي ماڊل جي تعمير جي اجازت ڏئي ٿي ۽ تنهن ڪري، سڀئي الگورٿم ۽ رياضي جيڪي بولين لاجڪ سان بيان ڪري سگهجن ٿا. لاجڪ سرڪٽس ۾ ملٽي پلڪسرز، رجسٽر، رياضي منطق يونٽ (ALUs) ۽ ڪمپيوٽر ميموري جهڙا ڊوائيس شامل آهن ۽ مڪمل مائڪرو پروسيسرز ذريعي انهن ۾ 100 ملين کان وڌيڪ لاجڪ گيٽ شامل ٿي سگهن ٿا.[5]
ڪمپائونڊ لاجڪ گيٽس AND-OR-invert ۽ OR-AND-invert اڪثر ڪري سرڪٽ ڊيزائن ۾ استعمال ڪيا ويندا آهن ڇاڪاڻ ته MOSFETs استعمال ڪندي انهن جي تعمير انفرادي گيٽس جي مجموعي کان آسان ۽ وڌيڪ ڪارآمد آهي.[6]
ست بنيادي لاجڪ گيٽس آهن:
- NOT
- OR
- NOR (OR بيان جي نفي)
- AND
- NAND (AND بيان جي نفي)
- XOR (خاص OR)
- XNOR (خاص OR بيان جي نفي)[7]
تاريخ ۽ ترقي
[سنواريو]بائنري نمبر سسٽم کي گوٽفريڊ ولهيلم ليبنز (1705ع ۾ شايع ٿيل) پاران بهتر ڪيو ويو، جيڪو قديم آءِ چنگ جي بائنري سسٽم کان متاثر هو.[8][9] ليبنز قائم ڪيو ته بائنري سسٽم استعمال ڪرڻ سان رياضي ۽ منطق جا اصول گڏ ٿين ٿا. سال 1837ع ۾ چارلس بيبيج پاران تيار ڪيل تجزياتي انجن گيئرز تي ٻڌل ميڪنيڪل لاجڪ گيٽ استعمال ڪيا ويا.[10]
سال 1886ع جي هڪ خط ۾، چارلس سينڊرز پيرس بيان ڪيو ته برقي سوئچنگ سرڪٽ ذريعي منطقي آپريشن ڪيئن ڪري سگهجن ٿا.[11] شروعاتي برقي ميڪاني ڪمپيوٽر ويڪيوم ٽيوب (ٿرميونڪ والوز) يا ٽرانزسٽر (جنهن مان پوء اليڪٽرانڪ ڪمپيوٽر ٺاهيا ويا) جي بعد جي جدتن جي بدران سوئچز ۽ ريلي لاجڪ مان ٺاهيا ويا هئا. لڊوگ وٽگنسٽائن 16-قطار سچائي ٽيبل جو هڪ نسخو ٽريڪٽيٽس لاجيڪو-فلسفوفس (1921ع) جي تجويز 5.101 جي طور تي متعارف ڪرايو. اتفاقي سرڪٽ جي موجد والٿر بوٿ کي 1924ع ۾ پهرين جديد اليڪٽرانڪ AND گيٽ لاءِ فزڪس ۾ 1954ع جو نوبل انعام مليو. [12] ڪونراڊ زوس پنهنجي ڪمپيوٽر "Z1" لاءِ اليڪٽروميڪينيڪل لاجڪ گيٽ ڊزائين ڪيا ۽ ٺاهيا (1935عکان 1938ع تائين).
سال 1934ع کان 1936ع تائين، اين اي سي انجنيئر اڪيرا نڪاشيما، ڪلاڊ شينن ۽ وڪٽر شيسٽاڪوف هڪ سلسلي ۾ سوئچنگ سرڪٽ ٿيوري متعارف ڪرائي جنهن ۾ ڏيکاريو ويو ته ٻه قدر وارا بولين الجبرا، جيڪو انهن آزاديءَ سان دريافت ڪيو، سوئچنگ سرڪٽ جي آپريشن کي بيان ڪري سگهي ٿو.[13][14][15][16] منطق کي لاڳو ڪرڻ لاءِ برقي سوئچ جي هن ملڪيت کي استعمال ڪرڻ بنيادي تصور آهي جيڪو سڀني اليڪٽرانڪ ڊجيٽل ڪمپيوٽرن جي بنياد آهي. سوئچنگ سرڪٽ ٿيوري ڊجيٽل سرڪٽ ڊيزائن جو بنياد بڻجي وئي، جيئن ته اها ٻي عالمي جنگ دوران ۽ بعد ۾ برقي انجنيئرنگ ڪميونٽي ۾ وڏي پيماني تي مشهور ٿي وئي، نظرياتي سختي سان ايڊهاڪ طريقن کي ختم ڪيو ويو جيڪي اڳ ۾ غالب هئا.[16]
سال 1948ع ۾، بارڊين ۽ برٽين هڪ انسولٽيڊ گيٽ ٽرانزسٽر (IGFET) کي هڪ انسولٽيڊ پرت سان پيٽنٽ ڪيو. سندن تصور اڄ CMOS ٽيڪنالاجي جو بنياد بڻجي ٿو.[17] 1957ع ۾، فروش ۽ ڊيرڪ PMOS ۽ NMOS پلانر گيٽ تيار ڪرڻ جي قابل هئا.[18] پوء بيل ليبز جي هڪ ٽيم PMOS ۽ NMOS گيٽ سان گڏ ڪم ڪندڙ MOS جو مظاهرو ڪيو.[19] ٻنهي قسمن کي بعد ۾ 1963ع ۾ فيئر چائلڊ سيمي ڪنڊڪٽر ۾ چي-ٽانگ ساه ۽ فرينڪ وانلاس پاران گڏ ڪيو ويو ۽ مڪمل MOS (CMOS) منطق ۾ ترتيب ڏنو ويو.[20]
علامتون
[سنواريو]
عام استعمال ۾ ابتدائي لاجڪ گيٽ لاءِ علامتن جا ٻه سيٽ آهن. ٻئي ANSI/IEEE Std 91-1984 ۾ بيان ڪيا ويا آهن ۽ ان جو اضافي ANSI/IEEE Std 91a-1991 "مخصوص شڪل" سيٽ، روايتي اسڪيميٽڪ جي بنياد تي، سادي ڊرائنگ لاءِ استعمال ڪيو ويندو آهي ۽ 1950ع ۽ 1960ع جي ڏهاڪي جي گڏيل رياستن جي فوجي معيار MIL-STD-806 مان نڪتل آهي.[21] ان کي ڪڏهن ڪڏهن غير رسمي طور تي، ان جي اصليت کي ظاهر ڪندي، "فوجي" طور بيان ڪيو ويندو آهي. "مستطيل شڪل" سيٽ (ANSI Y32.14 تي ٻڌل) ۽ ٻيا ابتدائي صنعت معيار (جيئن بعد ۾ IEEE ۽ IEC پاران بهتر ڪيل) سڀني قسمن جي گيٽ لاءِ مستطيل خاڪا آهن ۽ ڊوائيسز جي تمام گهڻي وسيع رينج جي نمائندگي جي اجازت ڏيڻ ٿا (روايتي علامتن سان ممڪن کان وڌيڪ).[22] IEC معيار، IEC 60617-12، ٻين معيارن پاران اختيار ڪيو ويو آهي. جهڙوڪ يورپ ۾ EN 60617-12:1999، برطانيه ۾ BS EN 60617-12:1999 ۽ جرمني ۾ DIN EN 60617-12:1998.
IEEE Std 91-1984 ۽ IEC 617-12 جو گڏيل مقصد ڊجيٽل سرڪٽ جي پيچيده منطقي ڪمن کي، اسڪيميٽڪ علامتن سان بيان ڪرڻ جو هڪجهڙائي طريقو مهيا ڪرڻ هو. اها ڪم سادي AND ۽ OR گيٽس کان وڌيڪ پيچيده هئا. اهي وچولي پيماني تي سرڪٽ، جهڙوڪ 4-بٽ ڪائونٽر يا وڏي پيماني تي سرڪٽ جهڙوڪ مائڪرو پروسيسر تائين ٿي سگهن ٿا.
IEC 617-12 ۽ ان جو ٻيهر نمبر ٿيل جانشين IEC 60617-12 واضح طور تي "مخصوص شڪل" علامتون نه ٿا ڏيکارين، پر انهن کان منع به نه ڪين.[22] اها، بهرحال، ANSI/IEEE Std 91 ۽ 91a ۾ هن نوٽ سان ڏيکاريل آهن:
"مخصوص شڪل جي علامت (IEC اشاعت 617، حصو 12 جي مطابق) ترجيح نه آهي، پر ان معيار جي تضاد ۾ نه سمجهيو ويندو آهي."
IEC 60617-12 مطابق نوٽ (سيڪشن 2.1) تي مشتمل آهي؛
"جيتوڻيڪ غير ترجيح ڏني وئي آهي. سرڪاري قومي معيارن پاران تسليم ٿيل ٻين علامتن جو استعمال (يعني علامتن جي جاءِ تي مخصوص شڪلون [بنيادي دروازن جي فهرست]) هن معيار سان تضاد ۾ نه سمجهيو ويندو گهرجي. پيچيده علامتن ٺاهڻ لاءِ انهن ٻين علامتن جو استعمال، مثال طور، ايمبيڊڊ علامتن جي طور تي استعمال، جي حوصلا افزائي ڪئي وئي آهي."
اهو سمجهوتو لاڳاپيل IEEE ۽ IEC ورڪنگ گروپن جي وچ ۾، IEEE ۽ IEC معيارن کي هڪ ٻئي سان باهمي تعميل ۾ هجڻ جي اجازت ڏيڻ لاءِ ٿيو.
1980ع جي ڏهاڪي ۾، اسڪيميٽڪ سرڪٽ بورڊ ۽ ڪسٽم IC ٻنهي کي ڊزائين ڪرڻ جو غالب طريقو هو، جيڪو "گيٽ ايري" (Gate Array) جي نالي سان سڃاتو وڃي ٿو. اڄڪلهه ڪسٽم آئي سي ۽ فيلڊ-پروگراميبل گيٽ ايري عام طور تي هارڊويئر وضاحتي ٻولين (HDL)، جهڙوڪ ويريلاگ يا وي ايڇ ڊي ايل، سان ٺهيل آهن.
| Type | Distinctive shape (IEEE Std 91/91a-1991) | Rectangular shape (IEEE Std 91/91a-1991) (IEC 60617-12:1997) | Boolean algebra between A and B | Truth table | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single-input gates | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Buffer |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| NOT (inverter) |
or |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| In electronics a NOT gate is more commonly called an inverter. The circle on the symbol is called a bubble and is used in logic diagrams to indicate a logic negation between the external logic state and the internal logic state (1 to 0 or vice versa). On a circuit diagram it must be accompanied by a statement asserting that the positive logic convention or negative logic convention is being used (high voltage level = 1 or low voltage level = 1, respectively). The wedge is used in circuit diagrams to directly indicate an active-low (low voltage level = 1) input or output without requiring a uniform convention throughout the circuit diagram. This is called Direct Polarity Indication. See IEEE Std 91/91A and IEC 60617-12. Both the bubble and the wedge can be used on distinctive-shape and rectangular-shape symbols on circuit diagrams, depending on the logic convention used. On pure logic diagrams, only the bubble is meaningful. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conjunction and disjunction | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| AND | or |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| OR | or |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Alternative denial and joint denial | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NAND | or |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| NOR | or |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Exclusive or and biconditional | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| XOR | or |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| The output of a two input exclusive-OR is true only when the two input values are different, and false if they are equal, regardless of the value. If there are more than two inputs, the output of the distinctive-shape symbol is undefined. The output of the rectangular-shaped symbol is true if the number of true inputs is exactly one or exactly the number following the "=" in the qualifying symbol. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| XNOR | or |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Implication and Nonimplication | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IMPLY[23] | or |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| NIMPLY | or |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| IMPLY and NIMPLY are not commutative, meaning that changing the order of the operands may change the result. For instance, is false, but is true; likewise, is true, but is false. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ڊي مورگن جي برابر علامتون
[سنواريو]By use of De Morgan's laws, an AND function is identical to an OR function with negated inputs and outputs. Likewise, an OR function is identical to an AND function with negated inputs and outputs. A NAND gate is equivalent to an OR gate with negated inputs, and a NOR gate is equivalent to an AND gate with negated inputs.
This leads to an alternative set of symbols for basic gates that use the opposite core symbol (AND or OR) but with the inputs and outputs negated. Use of these alternative symbols can make logic circuit diagrams much clearer and help to show accidental connection of an active high output to an active low input or vice versa. Any connection that has logic negations at both ends can be replaced by a negationless connection and a suitable change of gate or vice versa. Any connection that has a negation at one end and no negation at the other can be made easier to interpret by instead using the De Morgan equivalent symbol at either of the two ends. When negation or polarity indicators on both ends of a connection match, there is no logic negation in that path (effectively, bubbles "cancel"), making it easier to follow logic states from one symbol to the next. This is commonly seen in real logic diagrams – thus the reader must not get into the habit of associating the shapes exclusively as OR or AND shapes, but also take into account the bubbles at both inputs and outputs in order to determine the "true" logic function indicated.
A De Morgan symbol can show more clearly a gate's primary logical purpose and the polarity of its nodes that are considered in the "signaled" (active, on) state. Consider the simplified case where a two-input NAND gate is used to drive a motor when either of its inputs are brought low by a switch. The "signaled" state (motor on) occurs when either one OR the other switch is on. Unlike a regular NAND symbol, which suggests AND logic, the De Morgan version, a two negative-input OR gate, correctly shows that OR is of interest. The regular NAND symbol has a bubble at the output and none at the inputs (the opposite of the states that will turn the motor on), but the De Morgan symbol shows both inputs and output in the polarity that will drive the motor.
De Morgan's theorem is most commonly used to implement logic gates as combinations of only NAND gates, or as combinations of only NOR gates, for economic reasons.
ٽرٿ ٽيبلز
[سنواريو]Output comparison of various logic gates:
| Input | Output | |
| A | Buffer | Inverter |
| 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Input | Output | ||||||||
| A | B | AND | NAND | OR | NOR | XOR | XNOR | IMPLY | NIMPLY |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
يونيورسل لاجڪ گيٽس
[سنواريو]Charles Sanders Peirce (during 1880–1881) showed that NOR gates alone (or alternatively NAND gates alone) can be used to reproduce the functions of all the other logic gates, but his work on it was unpublished until 1933.[24] The first published proof was by Henry M. Sheffer in 1913, so the NAND logical operation is sometimes called Sheffer stroke; the logical NOR is sometimes called Peirce's arrow.[25] Consequently, these gates are sometimes called universal logic gates.[26]
| Type | NAND construction | NOR construction |
|---|---|---|
| NOT | ||
| AND | ||
| NAND | ||
| OR | ||
| NOR | ||
| XOR | ||
| XNOR | ||
| IMPLY | ||
| NIMPLY |
ڊيٽا اسٽوريج ۽ ترتيب وار منطق
[سنواريو]
Logic gates can also be used to hold a state, allowing data storage. A storage element can be constructed by connecting several gates in a "latch" circuit. Latching circuitry is used in static random-access memory. More complicated designs that use clock signals and that change only on a rising or falling edge of the clock are called edge-triggered "flip-flops". Formally, a flip-flop is called a bistable circuit, because it has two stable states which it can maintain indefinitely. The combination of multiple flip-flops in parallel, used to store a multiple-bit value, is known as a register. When using any of these gate setups the overall system has memory; it is then called a sequential logic system since its output can be influenced by its previous state(s), i.e. by the sequence of input states. In contrast, the output from combinational logic is purely a combination of its present inputs, unaffected by the previous input and output states.
These logic circuits are used in computer memory. They vary in performance, based on factors of speed, complexity, and reliability of storage, and many different types of designs are used based on the application.
صنعتي تياري
[سنواريو]اليڪٽرانڪ گيٽ
[سنواريو]A functionally complete logic system may be composed of relays, valves (vacuum tubes), or transistors.
Electronic logic gates differ significantly from their relay-and-switch equivalents. They are much faster, consume much less power, and are much smaller (all by a factor of a million or more in most cases). Also, there is a fundamental structural difference. The switch circuit creates a continuous metallic path for current to flow (in either direction) between its input and its output. The semiconductor logic gate, on the other hand, acts as a high-gain voltage amplifier, which sinks a tiny current at its input and produces a low-impedance voltage at its output. It is not possible for current to flow between the output and the input of a semiconductor logic gate.

For small-scale logic, designers now use prefabricated logic gates from families of devices such as the TTL 7400 series by Texas Instruments, the CMOS 4000 series by RCA, and their more recent descendants. Increasingly, these fixed-function logic gates are being replaced by programmable logic devices, which allow designers to pack many mixed logic gates into a single integrated circuit. The field-programmable nature of programmable logic devices such as FPGAs has reduced the "hard" property of hardware; it is now possible to change the logic design of a hardware system by reprogramming some of its components, thus allowing the features or function of a hardware implementation of a logic system to be changed.
An important advantage of standardized integrated circuit logic families, such as the 7400 and 4000 families, is that they can be cascaded. This means that the output of one gate can be wired to the inputs of one or several other gates, and so on. Systems with varying degrees of complexity can be built without great concern of the designer for the internal workings of the gates, provided the limitations of each integrated circuit are considered.
The output of one gate can only drive a finite number of inputs to other gates, a number called the "fan-out limit". Also, there is always a delay, called the "propagation delay", from a change in input of a gate to the corresponding change in its output. When gates are cascaded, the total propagation delay is approximately the sum of the individual delays, an effect which can become a problem in high-speed synchronous circuits. Additional delay can be caused when many inputs are connected to an output, due to the distributed capacitance of all the inputs and wiring and the finite amount of current that each output can provide.
Logic families
[سنواريو]- اصل مضمون جي لاءِ ڏسو Logic family
There are several logic families with different characteristics (power consumption, speed, cost, size) such as: RDL (resistor–diode logic), RTL (resistor–transistor logic), DTL (diode–transistor logic), TTL (transistor–transistor logic) and CMOS. There are also sub-variants, e.g. standard CMOS logic vs. advanced types using still CMOS technology, but with some optimizations for avoiding loss of speed due to slower PMOS transistors.
The simplest family of logic gates uses bipolar transistors, and is called resistor–transistor logic (RTL). Unlike simple diode logic gates (which do not have a gain element), RTL gates can be cascaded indefinitely to produce more complex logic functions. RTL gates were used in early integrated circuits. For higher speed and better density, the resistors used in RTL were replaced by diodes resulting in diode–transistor logic (DTL). Transistor–transistor logic (TTL) then supplanted DTL.

As integrated circuits became more complex, bipolar transistors were replaced with smaller field-effect transistors (MOSFETs); see PMOS and NMOS. To reduce power consumption still further, most contemporary chip implementations of digital systems now use CMOS logic. CMOS uses complementary (both n-channel and p-channel) MOSFET devices to achieve a high speed with low power dissipation.
Other types of logic gates include, but are not limited to:[27]
| Logic family | Abbreviation | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Diode logic | DL | |
| Tunnel diode logic | TDL | Exactly the same as diode logic but can perform at a higher speed.[حوالي ۾ موجود ناهي] |
| Neon logic | NL | Uses neon bulbs or 3-element neon trigger tubes to perform logic. |
| Core diode logic | CDL | Performed by semiconductor diodes and small ferrite toroidal cores for moderate speed and moderate power level. |
| 4Layer Device Logic | 4LDL | Uses thyristors and SCRs to perform logic operations where high current and or high voltages are required. |
| Direct-coupled transistor logic | DCTL | Uses transistors switching between saturated and cutoff states to perform logic. The transistors require carefully controlled parameters. Economical because few other components are needed, but tends to be susceptible to noise because of the lower voltage levels employed. Often considered to be the father to modern TTL logic. |
| Metal–oxide–semiconductor logic | MOS | Uses MOSFETs (metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistors), the basis for most modern logic gates. The MOS logic family includes PMOS logic, NMOS logic, complementary MOS (CMOS), and BiCMOS (bipolar CMOS). |
| Current-mode logic | CML | Uses transistors to perform logic but biasing is from constant current sources to prevent saturation and allow extremely fast switching. Has high noise immunity despite fairly low logic levels. |
| Quantum-dot cellular automata | QCA | Uses tunnelable q-bits for synthesizing the binary logic bits. The electrostatic repulsive force in between two electrons in the quantum dots assigns the electron configurations (that defines state 1 or state 0) under the suitably driven polarizations. This is a transistorless, currentless, junctionless binary logic synthesis technique allowing it to have very fast operation speeds. |
| Ferroelectric FET | FeFET | FeFET transistors can retain their state to speed recovery in case of a power loss.[28] |
Three-state logic gates
[سنواريو]
- اصل مضمون جي لاءِ ڏسو Three-state logic
A three-state logic gate is a type of logic gate that can have three different outputs: high (H), low (L) and high-impedance (Z). The high-impedance state plays no role in the logic, which is strictly binary. These devices are used on buses of the CPU to allow multiple chips to send data. A group of three-state outputs driving a line with a suitable control circuit is basically equivalent to a multiplexer, which may be physically distributed over separate devices or plug-in cards.
In electronics, a high output would mean the output is sourcing current from the positive power terminal (positive voltage). A low output would mean the output is sinking current to the negative power terminal (zero voltage). High impedance would mean that the output is effectively disconnected from the circuit.
Non-electronic logic gates
[سنواريو]Non-electronic implementations are varied, though few of them are used in practical applications. Many early electromechanical digital computers, such as the Harvard Mark I, were built from relay logic gates, using electro-mechanical relays. Logic gates can be made using pneumatic devices, such as the Sorteberg relay or mechanical logic gates, including on a molecular scale.[29] Various types of fundamental logic gates have been constructed using molecules (molecular logic gates), which are based on chemical inputs and spectroscopic outputs.[30] Logic gates have been made out of DNA (see DNA nanotechnology)[31] and used to create a computer called MAYA (see MAYA-II). Logic gates can be made from quantum mechanical effects, see quantum logic gate. Photonic logic gates use nonlinear optical effects.
In principle any method that leads to a gate that is functionally complete (for example, either a NOR or a NAND gate) can be used to make any kind of digital logic circuit. Note that the use of 3-state logic for bus systems is not needed, and can be replaced by digital multiplexers, which can be built using only simple logic gates (such as NAND gates, NOR gates, or AND and OR gates).
پڻ ڏسو
[سنواريو]- ڪمپيوٽنگ
- بولين الجبرا
- ڊجيٽل سرڪٽ
- انٽيگريٽڊ سرڪٽ
- پروسيسر
- ٽرٿ ٽيبل
- And-inverter graph
- Boolean algebra topics
- Boolean function
- Depletion-load NMOS logic
- Electronic symbol
- Espresso heuristic logic minimizer
- Emitter-coupled logic
- Fan-out
- Field-programmable gate array (FPGA)
- Flip-flop (electronics)
- Functional completeness
- Integrated injection logic
- Karnaugh map
- Combinational logic
- List of 4000 series integrated circuits
- List of 7400 series integrated circuits
- Logic family
- Logic level
- Logical graph
- Logic redundancy
- Magnetic logic
- NMOS logic
- Parametron
- Processor design
- Programmable logic controller (PLC)
- Programmable logic device (PLD)
- Propositional calculus
- Race hazard
- Reversible computing
- Superconducting computing
- Unconventional computing
حوالا
[سنواريو]- ↑ Jaeger (1997). Microelectronic Circuit Design. McGraw-Hill. ص. 226–233. ISBN 0-07-032482-4.
- ↑ Kanellos, Michael (February 11, 2003). "Moore's Law to roll on for another decade". CNET. From Integrated circuit
- ↑ Zhang, Ting; Cheng, Ying; Guo, Jian-Zhong; Xu, Jian-yi; Liu, Xiao-jun (2015), "Acoustic logic gates and Boolean operation based on self-collimating acoustic beams", Applied Physics Letters, 106 (11) 113503, Bibcode:2015ApPhL.106k3503Z, doi:10.1063/1.4915338, 2024-08-17 تي حاصل ڪيل
- ↑ Wang, Lei; Li, Baowen (2007). "Thermal Logic Gates: Computation with Phonons". Physical Review Letters 99 (17). doi:. PMID 17995368. Bibcode: 2007PhRvL..99q7208W. https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.177208.
- ↑ Deschamps, Jean-Pierre; Valderrama, Elena; Terés, Lluís (12 October 2016). Digital Systems: From Logic Gates to Processors. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-41198-9.
- ↑ Tinder, Richard F. (2000). Engineering digital design (2nd ڇاپو). Academic Press. ص. 317–319. ISBN 0-12-691295-5.
- ↑ https://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~goetz/projects/logic/logic2.html
- ↑ Nylan, Michael (2001). The Five "Confucian" Classics. Yale University Press. ص. 204–206. ISBN 978-0-300-08185-5. 2010-06-08 تي حاصل ڪيل.
- ↑ Perkins, Franklin (2004). "Exchange with China". Leibniz and China: A Commerce of Light. Cambridge University Press. ص. 117. ISBN 978-0-521-83024-9.
... one of the traditional orderings of the hexagrams, the xiantian tu ordering made by Shao Yong, was, with a few modifications, the same order found in Leibniz's binary arithmetic.
- ↑ Julio Sanchez; Maria P. Canton (Dec 19, 2017). Embedded Systems Circuits and Programming. CRC Press. ص. 17. ISBN 978-1-4398-7931-3.
- ↑ Peirce, C. S., "Letter, Peirce to A. Marquand", dated 1886, Writings of Charles S. Peirce, v. 5, 1993, pp. 420–423. See "Review: Charles S. Peirce, The new elements of mathematics". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 84 (5): 913–918 [917]. 1978. doi:. http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS/Repository/1.0/Disseminate?view=body&id=pdf_1&handle=euclid.bams/1183541145.
- ↑ Luisa Bonolis; Walther Bothe and Bruno Rossi: The birth and development of coincidence methods in cosmic-ray physics. Am. J. Phys. 1 November 2011; 79 (11): 1133–1150.
- ↑ Yamada, Akihiko (2004). "History of Research on Switching Theory in Japan". IEEJ Transactions on Fundamentals and Materials (Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan) 124 (8): 720–726. doi:. Bibcode: 2004IJTFM.124..720Y. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ieejfms/124/8/124_8_720/_article.
- ↑ "Switching Theory/Relay Circuit Network Theory/Theory of Logical Mathematics". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan.
- ↑ Stanković, Radomir S.; Astola, Jaakko T.; Karpovsky, Mark G. (2007). Some Historical Remarks on Switching Theory. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.66.1248.
- 1 2 Stanković, Radomir S. [in جرمن]; Astola, Jaakko Tapio [in فنش], مرتب (2008). Reprints from the Early Days of Information Sciences: TICSP Series On the Contributions of Akira Nakashima to Switching Theory (PDF). Tampere International Center for Signal Processing (TICSP) Series. جلد 40. Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland. ISBN 978-952-15-1980-2. ISSN 1456-2774. اصل نسخو (PDF) مان 2021-03-08 تي محفوظ ڪيل.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (ڳنڍڻو) (3+207+1 pages) 10:00 min - ↑ Howard R. Duff (2001). "John Bardeen and transistor physics". AIP Conference Proceedings. جلد 550. ص. 3–32. doi:10.1063/1.1354371.
- ↑ Frosch, C. J.; Derick, L (1957). "Surface Protection and Selective Masking during Diffusion in Silicon" (en ۾). Journal of the Electrochemical Society 104 (9): 547. doi:. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/1.2428650.
- ↑ Lojek, Bo (2007). History of Semiconductor Engineering. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. ص. 321. ISBN 978-3-540-34258-8.
- ↑ "1963: Complementary MOS Circuit Configuration is Invented". Computer History Museum. 6 July 2019 تي حاصل ڪيل.
- ↑ "Graphical Symbols for Logic Diagrams". ASSIST Quick Search. Defense Logistics Agency. MIL-STD-806. 2021-08-27 تي حاصل ڪيل.
- 1 2 "Overview of IEEE Standard 91-1984 Explanation of Logic Symbols" (PDF). Texas Instruments Semiconductor Group. 1996. SDYZ001A.
- ↑ Mathematics for Computer Science (PDF). 2015. ص. 41.
- ↑ Peirce, C. S. (manuscript winter of 1880–1881), "A Boolian Algebra with One Constant", published 1933 in Collected Papers v. 4, paragraphs 12–20. Reprinted 1989 in Writings of Charles S. Peirce v. 4, pp. 218–221, Google . See Roberts, Don D. (2009). "7.12 The Graphical Analysis of Propositions". The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce. De Gruyter. ص. 131. ISBN 978-3-11022622-5.
- ↑ Büning, Hans Kleine; Lettmann, Theodor (1999). Propositional logic: deduction and algorithms. Cambridge University Press. ص. 2. ISBN 978-0-521-63017-7.
- ↑ Bird, John (2007). Engineering mathematics. Newnes. ص. 532. ISBN 978-0-7506-8555-9.
- ↑ Rowe, Jim. "Circuit Logic – Why and How". شمارو December 1966. Electronics Australia.
- ↑ "Tapping into Non-Volatile Logic". 21 April 2021.
- ↑ Merkle, Ralph C. (1993). "Two Types of Mechanical Reversible Logic". Xerox PARC.
- ↑ Erbas-Cakmak, Sundus; Kolemen, Safacan; Sedgwick, Adam C.; Gunnlaugsson, Thorfinnur; James, Tony D.; Yoon, Juyoung; Akkaya, Engin U. (2018). "Molecular logic gates: the past, present and future" (en ۾). Chemical Society Reviews 47 (7): 2228–2248. doi:. ISSN 0306-0012. PMID 29493684. http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C7CS00491E.
- ↑ "Deoxyribozyme-Based Logic Gates". Journal of the American Chemical Society 124 (14): 3555–3561. 2002. doi:. PMID 11929243. Bibcode: 2002JAChS.124.3555S. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja016756v.
وڌيڪ مطالعي لاء
[سنواريو]- Bostock, Geoff (1988). Programmable logic devices: technology and applications. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-006611-3.
- Brown, Stephen D.; Francis, Robert J.; Rose, Jonathan; Vranesic, Zvonko G. (1992). Field Programmable Gate Arrays. Kluwer Academic. ISBN 978-0-7923-9248-4.
ٻاهريان ڳنڍڻا
[سنواريو]
وڪيميڊيا العام تي لاجڪ گيٽ بابت زمرا
- مضمون with short description
- Short description is different from Wikidata
- CS1 maint: location missing publisher
- CS1 interwiki-linked names
- سمورا مضمون جيڪي حوالن مطابق ناهن
- سمورا مضمون جيڪي حوالن مطابق ناهن from December 2017
- Articles with invalid date parameter in template
- Commons category with local link different than on Wikidata
- GND سان سڃاڻپ ڪندڙ وڪيپيڊيا مضمون
- لاجڪ گيٽ
- لاجڪ گيٽس
- الگورٿم
- بولين الجبرا
- ڪمپيوٽر سائنس
- ڪمپيوٽر انجنيئرنگ
- ڪمپيوٽر سسٽم